Search for: "Classic Pharmacy, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 9:24 am
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al., No. 2:09-1000, 2010 U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
(a) Though the classic taking is a transfer of property by eminent domain, the Clause applies to other state actions that achieve the same thing, including those that recharacterize as public property what was previously private property, see Webb’s Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 10:51 am
(Citations omitted. ) Then, just two months ago, in ARP Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
(Beverly, MA) Best Aid Pharmacy Inc. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Pfizer, Inc. (2010) 49 Cal.4th 758 in which the Supreme Court held retail pharmacies had standing to assert UCL claims against pharmaceutical companies that had allegedly engaged in price fixing even though the retail pharmacies were able to pass on any overcharges to their customers. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:36 am
A classic case of prolonging a drug's availability through a black box warning is Avandia (rosiglitazone), used to increase the body's sensitivity to insulin in type 2 (adult-onset) diabetes. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:36 am
A classic case of prolonging a drug's availability through a black box warning is Avandia (rosiglitazone), used to increase the body's sensitivity to insulin in type 2 (adult-onset) diabetes. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 7:22 am
The very early decision in Access Now, Inc. v Southwest Airlines, Inc. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm
WILLIAMS PHARMACY, INC. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:58 am
The first shipment of the generic version, atorvastatin, costs about 15 percent less, said Mike Koelzer, owner of Kay Pharmacy at 2178 Plainfield Ave. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
Sciele Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 1:16 pm
Drug companies paying pharmacies to switch patient prescriptions. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Sure, perhaps the classic example of such an act. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Nike, Inc., the California Supreme Court in finding Nike’s speech commercial, looked at three factors: (1) the speaker; (2) the intended audience; and (3) the content of the message (i.e. is the representation about [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
Most notably there’s Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Even though the New Jersey act does not require classic "reliance," it still demands proof of an "ascertainable loss" that is causally related to the allegedly illegal conduct. 2007 WL 2493917, at *9-10. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:58 am
Sherkow, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Nicholson Price, and Rachel SachsModerna, Inc., a Cambridge, MA-based biotech company, is a leading contender in the race to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Time, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Houston College of Law, Inc., No. 16-CV-1839 (S.D. [read post]
